No. 23-7811
Frederick Ware-Newsome v. Southern Management Companies, LLC
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-review civil-procedure court-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-review maryland-supreme-court public-interest standing state-courts
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . Did the decision of the Maryland Supreme Court Chief Justice Matthew Fader properly review this case and is his finding accurate? He stated he did not see how this case was in the Best Interest of the Public. This case is clearly in the best interest of the public when it is showing the clear violations of the court systems of Maryland and its judges. i
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2024-10-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent Southern Management Companies, LLC to respond filed.
2024-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2024)
2024-04-24
Application (23A954) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 21, 2024.
2024-04-20
Application (23A954) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 22, 2024 to June 21, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Southern Management Companies, LLC
Claire Kim — Southern Management Companies, LLC, Respondent
Claire Kim — Southern Management Companies, LLC, Respondent