Whether the applicant was denied effective assistance of counsel in the appeal proceedings, due to the silent and undeveloped record that resulted therein and on appeal

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . \), Did oz Whether She bhighest Sole Court Reviewed we edhre Record aud Cubed 40 Recoguize Applicat hes established by a prepordernnde of She oitlesce Get Ye wes Covsinuchve Denied Assishwce of Counsel in ne eplee proceedings, due do # Silevt gud! audlevelop Record nat Resulted Yeinl axd on Appent. 2), Did oe whether Whe <lole Courts deyecked), overlooked — oR iqsozed Aoolcavt Clans, whhort a Reason or explawelas, | Wek prejudiced him AS Couleeny 40 of wvolved av uysnengsable Applieaked of Yedozal tow. due do Une abale Counts Obligaed under Ver: Code Crim Roe Avy. Mal, 89,14 aud Beacly VO. Meryiantdh , ce ‘