No. 23-7826
Festus Okwudili Ohan v. Charles P. Rettig, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction property standing takings constitutional-provisions judicial-review jurisdictional-issues legal-interpretation procedural-rights statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED vighy Waxak Michelle Johnson Cunished Property Het Trew nothing alert Cfrgte gry come eating tag me? | (2) ng KA ah Ha Fodger pf , ¢ A Sets lia ¥ fudgk Shaver LgO ML ax~ound State to Hutte, phere trey tiehavat Cor &S, Porch wage t > Fe anol fac Ro Prckorage (fle, bace nents se” TOWGh OX NY Ca 229 pyro
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-11
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent