Whether the United States and the Several States are Artificial Persons

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (I) Whether the United States and the Several States are Artificial Persons. (I) Whether the 14 Amendment created Artificial Persons as citizens of the United States. : (Il) = Whether Rights under the Constitution are only civil privileges and immunities and laws are commercial. (IV) | Whether Congress in drafting laws for United States Citizens, operate outside of the Constitution because the Constitution only pertains to the States as parties to it. (Vv) Whether consent is a prerequisite to governance by the United States and , application of laws of non-citizens. (VI) | Whether a person is naturalized by way of Birth Certificate as a U.S. Citizen and whether that contract binding upon one who is not a signatory to it. Yueseyuan Cruel, Petitioner and Defendant-Appellant below United States of America, Respondent and Plaintiff-Appellee below . 2 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States Nos. 24-6267, 24-6268, and 24-6269 Yueseyuan Cruel., Petitioner, . v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORAR! TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI . INTRODUCTION The United States Constitution only authorizes the courts to take personal jurisdiction in very limited instances. None-U.S. Citizens are not bound by the laws of Congress. U.S. Citizens do not enjoy Constitutional protections and the laws that govern them are not written to conform to the Constitution. OPINIONS AND ORDERS BELOW Neither the District Court nor the U.S. Court of Appeals gave an opinion. JURISDICTION The court of appeals entered judgment on May 24, 2024. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1). 3 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED Relevant constitutional and statutory provisions are reproduced in the arguments herein. STATEMENT A. Facts giving rise to this Case This case arises out of the Unites States bringing criminal complaints against a natural person and the Federal Courts taking personal jurisdiction of the same. The Civil Rights granted by the 14" Amendment may only have civil obligations, duties, and consequences. To be Enfranchised into a Political Body, that body itself must corporate instructor, an artificial person. in order to create citizens of that body, those citizens must also be artificial persons, created and naturalized by the 14'* Amendment. Natural persons enjoy God given rights which cannot be impeded upon by artificial persons. The consent of the governed is the willful, knowing and intentional act of relinquishing of some of those rights to said body. Yueseyuan Cruel, at no time, was a signatory to neither a State nor the U.S. Constitution. Nor was Yueseyuan Cruel a signatory to the application for Birth Certificate which is the contract of Allegiance that created U.S. Citizenship. Said contract is not merely voidable but is hereby void in ab initio per contract law. B. The District Court Proceedings The U.S. Constitution set specific limits on this Court’s authority to adjudicate matters before it. U.S. Citizens were not contemplated by the Framers because the United States did not have citizens, only member States which that Constitution was intended to govern. With the creation of U.S. Citizens as residents of the District of Columbia, Congress created corporate citizens outside the reach of the Constitution. These citizens have no Constitutional protections because the Constitution directs States and their actions. D.C. is not a State, and its citizens have no protections or representation. They are governed solely by Congress and the laws that govern them, particularly Titles 18 and 42 does not have to conform to the constitution when applied to the U.S. Citizen. All laws are civil in nature and crimes are commercial by default. The Supreme Court sets rule for lower courts that must adhere to the authority granted to it by the Constitution under Article 3. The District Court had subje