No. 23-7839

Martin William Luther Hamilton v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act categorical-analysis criminal-law deference-to-state-courts legal-interpretation state-crime state-criminal-law supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-taylor violent-crime
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal court must defer to a state's highest appellate court's 'least culpable' interpretation of a state crime and follow this Court's directions in United States v. Taylor when conducting a categorical analysis to determine if that state crime is a violent crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Where a state’s highest court endorses two versions of the elements of a state crime and neither version has been overruled or abrogated, whether a court of appeals must defer to a state’s highest appellate court’s “least culpable” interpretation of that state’s law, and whether a federal court must follow this Court’s directions in United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022), when conducting a categorical analysis to determine if that state crime is a violent crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(1). 1

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2024)

Attorneys

Martin Hamilton
Kathleen GleasonFederal Public Defender, MDNC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent