Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Homeowner as a whistleblower has uncovered one of the largest mortgage scams in USA history! Homeowner is winning member of the class action ROBINSON (DCMDGreenbelt) on RESPA violations — a subcategory of instant case. It is now proven the white-collar criminal Mortgagees misused taxpayers’ bailout monies to buy as many of their caused by Great Recession defaulted mortgage loans as possible at pennies on the dollar. Then, instead of properly helping homeowners save their homes by refinancing, they violated RESPA to compound exponential profits by stealing homes with equity and appreciation while fraudulently writing off tax losses and avoiding taxes and state juries by illegally operating in violation AMERICAN BANE ... U.S. 350 (1921). Court resolving these conflicts and loopholes large enough to drive a house through will help homeowners as did with JESINOSKTI, etc. 1. Conflict of Binding Service for court jurisdiction and Res Judicata. In the relatively new development of corporations acting as registered agents for summon service, did the USCA11 err by creating a new standard of who qualifies for process of service in violation to Rule 4 Summons that is irreconcilably more lenient than even Bankruptcy Courts? USCA11 ruled modern day legal service companies “can choose whoever they want to receive service” in conflict to historical legally recognized authority service Rule 4. Instant ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued case started with only a mail slot, no people. Now unspecified people whom USCA11 did not correct “minor age, mentally retarded part-time janitor?” 2. Violations of U.S. and judicial international sovereignty: When and how does a non-USA based, international foreign company (Deutsche, Germany) come into jurisdiction of USA and a state (Georgia) and then via Removal from a state into Federal Courts (DCN.GA & USCA11), when said foreign corporation is operating in violation of U.S. Supreme Court AMERICAN BANK & TRUST CO. V. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, 256 U.S. 350 (1921) and Congressional Laws Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Dodd-Frank? Homeowner is a whistleblower. 38. Conflicts of Jurisdiction: How are federal courts to implement and enforce federal court jurisdiction per Court’s correct new ruling BP P.L.C. V. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE to resolve conflicts of jurisdiction between nullity origin state orders and federal courts “do not disturb state” even when in conflict with its own jurisdiction and law? 4. Conflict or procedural jurisdiction: Does a federal court have jurisdiction on a party when party has no standing in any court due to “first breach”? Recent DCMiddleGA in MALONE V. FED. HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 2016. “MALONE” ruled “a party who committed first breach cannot enforce any part of contract until it cures the first breach”. Did DCNorthGA iii QUESTIONS PRESENTED -— Continued and USCA11 err and create conflict by not only allowing a Removal, but also rule in favor of First Breach Mortgagees filings and against Homeowner who never missed a payment? 5. Ruling needed to harmonize recent applicable JESINOSKI with MALONE and ROBINSON to cure conflict of USCA11. What are the national standards for homeowners dealing with First Breach when the homeowner never defaulted on payments but only quit paying the proven improper first breach of contract ever increasing interest rate dollar amount after three months of fulfilling JESINOSKI paying under written protest the ever-increasing amounts with provided proof of breach by mortgagee’s own employees and closing attorneys (also given to courts in exhibits)? Did USCAI11 err with no law cites claiming Homeowner should have sued first instead of comply with Mortgagees request per RESPA as winning member of ROBINSON in DCMDGreenbelt and then file defensive lawsuit to prevent attempted wrongful foreclosure? 6. Conflict of enforcing Candor to the Tribunal (37 CFR § 11.303 and Bar State Rule 3.3): When complained monopoly of fraud upon the courts was fina