No. 23-805

Christopher Paul George v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-v-cockrell ninth-circuit supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit ignore the process re-emphasized by this Court in Buck v. Davis and Miller-El, by refusing to issue Cristopher P. George a COA, thereby requiring him to make a far more demanding showing, as the court also affirmed the district court's disregard of George's prima facie showing of IAC and entitlement to relief in his 2255 habeas?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the Ninth Circuit ignore the process re-emphasized by this Court in Buck v. Davis and MillerEl,’ by refusing to issue Cristopher P. George a COA,” thereby requiring him to make a far more demanding showing, as the court also affirmed the district court’s disregard of George’s prima facie showing of IAC® and entitlement to relief in his 22554 habeas? 1 Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115 (2017) and Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). 2 Certificate of Appealability. 3 Ineffective assistance of counsel. 4 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Christopher P. Gorge
Ezekiel E. CortezLaw Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
Ezekiel E. CortezLaw Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent