No. 23-808

Eurho Joe v. Supreme Court of California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial judicial-misconduct legal-remedy liberty procedural-due-process procedural-steps state-court-jurisdiction state-courts state-laws
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How can a person's right and liberty to pursue happiness be maintained or recovered when severely damaged by the decisions made by the state courts not following the terms, conditions, and the procedural steps specified in the state laws?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ' : 1. How can a person’s right and liberty to pursue ; ; ; happiness be maintained or. recovered when ; severely damaged by the decisions made by the . : state courts not following the terms, conditions, and the procedural steps specified in the state ; laws? . ce 2. How can the litigant’s right of fair litigation be . ; ; ’ maintained or recovered when it is severely and : critically damaged by the state court’s improper and unlawful acts not limited to but including? 3. Can any good cause be found from no cause presented? .

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-06
Waiver of right of respondent Supreme Court of California to respond filed.
2023-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Eurho Joe
Eurho Joe — Petitioner
Eurho Joe — Petitioner
Supreme Court of California
Sharon M. NagleBold, Polisner, Maddow, Nelson & Judson, Respondent
Sharon M. NagleBold, Polisner, Maddow, Nelson & Judson, Respondent