No. 23-809
Peter Kleidman v. Martin R. Barash, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: brown-vs-board civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-tort due-process equitable-relief federal-judges free-speech judicial-immunity prospective-injunction pulliam-precedent standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are federal judges immune from claims for equitable relief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; Are federal judges immune from claims for equitable relief? ; rb A, Pulliam v. Allen, 466 US 522 (1984) held “that weg judicial immunity is not a bar to prospective ; ‘ injunctive relief against 4 judicial officer acting in her judicial capacity.” /d., 541-542. Pulliam pertained to state-court judges. Does Pulliam also hold for federal judges? Does a litigant in federal court have any right of action to protect him/herself from a federal judge’s constitutional torts occurring dehors the written record? ‘
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent