Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine was intended to shield Defendants in a Title 42 section 1983 claim, in immunity for their actions of fraudulently initiating and harmfully conducting State Court proceedings with a Want of Jurisdiction and Usurpation of Power?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine was intended to shield Defendants; in a Title 42 section 1983 claim, in immunity for their actions of fraudulently initiating and harmfully conducting State Court proceedings with a Want of Jurisdiction and Usurpation of Power? 2. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to , cases where the Petitioner alleged that a “Fraud of the Court” was perpetrated on the court, by Respondents French, Pinheiro, and Bigley? . 3. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to this independent claim in Federal Court where the Petitioner seeks redress, not for a State Court Judgment that has been paid, but rather for the injuries inflicted by the MA State Court Proceedings that constituted Want of Jurisdiction and a Subversion of Congress / State? (i)