whether-enforcing-28-usc-455(a)-will-restore-public-confidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether enforcing the statutory requirement of the appearance of 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), will restore the public’s recordlow confidence in the judiciary or severely injured the public’s view of our judicial system and its reputation if this Court does not grant this Petition? 2. Whether a court with an alleged conflict of interest, should be the same court to rule on its own 3. Whether the baseless dismissal of Salem’s Complaint against government officials, under Rule 12(b), further erodes the public’s confidence in our judiciary? 4. Whether the Seventh Circuit erroneously conducted a fact-finding to determine to impose sanctions? u STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s en banc decision, Salem v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, et al., No. 223222, decision dated: October 27, 2023 (App. 15a) United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, reissued decision, Salem v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, et al., No. 223222, decision dated: September 28, 2023 (App. 1a) United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s Order, Salem v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, et al., No. 22-3222, Order Impose Fine dated: October 27, 2028 (App. 12a) United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Salem v. Larkin, et al., No. 20-CV06531, decision dated: November 23, 2022. (App. 17a). United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Northern Division, Salem v. Larkin, et al., Case No. 2:20-CV-220, decision dated: November 2, 2020. (App. 37a).