Did Shawn Jay-Z Carter have a legal duty owed to the Petitioner, and did he breach of that duty?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The schedule of a phenomenal, superstar U.S. Rapper and Executive has to be a tiring, stressful one. Stress and loss of rest has to intensify with the addition of Executive duties such as business workshops and classes to properly run businesses such as Rocawear Clothing, 40/40 Club, Armand de Brignac ~ Champagne and others. The transition must have been extensive including interviews, promotional events : and concert tours for a gentleman who has less than a high school graduates education. Within the midst of becoming disciplined and prepared to take on the world, this Great M.C. would require assistance from : others with business preparations, liaisons to assist -with balancing schedules and songwriters to assist with lyrics and ideas to create Phenomenal Hits repeatedly in a short amount of time! , 1. With other Copyright Owners listed on U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright Registrations, is it possible that Shawn Jay-Z Carter received needed assistance with composing lyrics for songs, he made into hits? And if so, is it possible Shawn Jay-Z Carter with so many new business ventures may have forgotten to compensate a person who assisted him with composing lyrics for songs a songwriter which is listed under a Pseudonym on U.S. Copyright Registrations jointly owned by the songwriter, Shawn Jay-Z Carter and others? 2. Did Shawn Jay-Z Carter have a legal duty owed to the Petitioner, and did he breach of that duty? Given the Petitioner’s sufferance of an injury and proof that Defendant’s breach caused the injury (typically ii defined through proximate cause) constitute elements evidencing this violation? 3. Did the Counsel of the Defendant make a statement of Defamation within their opening argu/ ments of Defendant’s 7 Motion for Dismissal? Was the Statement, “Howard has tried this trick before: he has brought lawsuits in other districts against other rappers similarly claiming to have written their music and to have loaned them millions of dollars. See e.g. Howard v. Pearl, No. (C.D. Cal.): Howard v. 3, 6 Mafia, No. 1:20-cv-06116-LLS (S.D.N.Y.). Howard is a serial litigant whose unfounded claims should be dismissed with prejudice for at least three independent reasons.” a deceitful technique used : to get Plaintiff Jermaine Howard’s Complaint dismissed because Counsel’s Statement contrasts Defendant Shawn Jay-Z Carter’s Statement, “JAY-Z denies : Howard’s allegations but accepts any well pleaded facts as true for the purpose of this motion only see e.g. Trustees of Upstate N.Y. Eng’rs Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset Mgmt., 843 F.3d 561, 566 (2d Cir. 2016).”; ~ the statement was placed in a footnote on page #8 of Defendant Carter’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint, 1:20-cv-00417, Jermaine Jevon Howard v. Shawn Jay-Z Carter? And would this statement of Defamation be a depiction of how the Defendant regards the ; Plaintiff which has left the Plaintiff injured as far as not receiving the Plaintiffs division of profits for being an author (Co-author) of songs with Defendant : along with slighting the Plaintiff to the degree that _ the Plaintiffs songwriting career was snuffed out? LIST OF PROCEEDINGS United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit No. 22-1557 Jermaine Jevon Howard, “Chooie”, v. Shawn Jay-Z Carter, (Rocafella Records), DefendantAppellee, Kareem Biggs Burke, (Rocafella Records), Damon Dame Dash, (Rocafella Records), Defendants. Date of Final Order: November 17, 2022 Date of Rehearing Denial: January 12, 2023 United States District Court for the Western District of New York No. 20-CV-417 Jermaine Jevon Howard, “Chooie”, Plaintiff v. Shawn Jay-Z Carter, (Rocafella Records), Kareem ; Biggs Burke (Rocafella Records), Damon Dame Dash (Rocafella Records), Defendants Date of Final Decision/Judgment: August 3-4, 2022