No. 23-842

Patricia Polanco, et al. v. Ralph Diaz, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process government-liability immunity judicial-doctrine law-enforcement legal-standard qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Related Cases: 23-722 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-22
Reply of petitioners Patricia Polanco, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-04-08
Brief of respondents Ralph Diaz, et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2024.
2024-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2024 to April 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Patricia Polanco, et al.
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery, Petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery, Petitioner
Ralph Diaz, et al.
Christopher David Hu — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Christopher David Hu — California Department of Justice, Respondent