Can each individual federal prosecutor present their written authority to prosecute?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can each individual of the three federal prosecutors, to ensure that their government branch recognizes the limits of its own power by presenting to the Honorable : Court their individual original “Written, signed AUTHORITY by the SOT, Mr. John W. Snow (dated between April, 14-18, 2006), to further prosecute each individual listed IRS violations included inthe federal grand jury Indictment” Counts 1-45, based on Title 26, Section 7206(2) & (1), April 14, 2006? 2. There are clear & fair processes for enforcing the law : to reach a clear resolve, liquidation settlement, whereby : if any individual of the three federal prosecutors fails to present the original said “AUTHORITY” to the Honorable Court, thus showing the Plaintiff's Constitutional Rights of the 1°, 4%, 5", 8 & 14" Amendments have been violated then redress’s by the four co-defendants are required to be paid tax-free to the Plaintiffs Trust (LOUIS WAYNE RATFIELD TRUST), within 30 days of the Courts Order? 3. In said BIVEN’S case, not analogous to Section 1983, concerning IRS alleged violations, is there any “absolute prosecutorial immunity” for fraudulent activity by the same three federal prosecutors, since IRS is not “state” with nothing to do with 42 USC, Sec. 1983 (state), as the tower Courts would like us to believe? 4. What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to the bias United States District Court judge to convert a BIVEN’S claim to one under 42 USC, Sec. 1983? 5. What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to the bias United States District Court judge to issue an Order to help his lying federal prosecutor in a case that has been closed for almost a year? , Ww 6. What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to a bias United States judge to quote in the judge’s opinion that said civil complaint does not state a legally cognizable claim for relief is frivolous, whereby he must dismiss “without prejudice” yet the bias judge dismissed “with prejudice”? 7. Is Judge MIDDLEBROOKS stating by dismissing “with prejudice” that the claimis an actual legally cognizable claim? 8. What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to the bias United States judge to change a Biven’s case with fraudulent activity under color of law by the three rogue federal prosecutors with no statute of limitations into a state 1983 case giving said three rogue federat prosecutors absolute immunity? 9. What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to United States District Court Judge to sign the arrest warrant while not following the procedures contained in the USSC opinion in U.S. v. LaSalle National Bank (No 77-365, June 19, 1978(a) “Congress...created a tax enforcement system... & any limitation on the good faith use of an IRS summons must reflect the statutory premise”? 10. How did the egregious fraudulent actions of the three bogus federal prosecutors in the prosecution of multiple alleged individual IRS violations listed in the federal grand jury Indictment without said “AUTHORITY” comply with the 14" Amendment Due Process Clause, which guarantees procedural due process meaning that government actors must follow certain procedures before they may deprive a person of a protected life, liberty, or property interest? 11.What US Statute gives “AUTHORITY” to the IRS to deny filed Forms 1041X? ae 12. Does the US Supreme Court have stare decisis on the arrest warrant under U.S. v. LaSalle National Bank as said USSC case has not been amended in any way since 1978? 13. What US Statute of limitations is there for “fraud” by a government official? 14. Sec. 1983 violates the 14° Amendment, stating the Statute of Limitations begins to run when the Plaintiff becomes detained pursuant to legal process. The Plaintiffhas never been detained with a legal process, whereby is the Plaintiff stilt under the Statute of Limitations? 15. Judge MIDDLEBROOKS stated “A claim is frivolous if itis without arguable merit either in law of fact.”Are FOIA replies from DOJ-CID stating two of the three rogue fedetal prosecutors DO NOT have “written,