No. 23-85

James Giehl v. Bank of America

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2023-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 18-U.S.C.-Sec.-242 4th-amendment civil-case civil-rights color-of-law foreclosure-process fourth-amendment judicial-misconduct void-decision void-decisions
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do Florida Judges have the ability to depart from a person's 4th-Amendment-Rights and violate the 'color-of-law-18-U.S.C.-Sec.-242 code to avoid correcting known void decisions within a civil case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This “one in a million” case is a result of the Florida Courts at every level refusing to correct numerous violations of civil rights, laws, rules, and doctrine once the matters were brought to their attention. The questions presented are: 1) Do Florida Judges have the ability to depart from a person’s 4 Amendment Rights and violate the “color of law” (18 U.S.C. Sec. 242) code to avoid correcting known void decisions within a civil case. : . 2) Can known misconduct performed by the ; Florida State Courts be allowed to erode the public trust placed within the courts, the Florida : foreclosure process, and establish illegal case law without the important check and balances provided by the U.S. Supreme Court. 1

Docket Entries

2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-03-04

Attorneys

James Giehl
James Giehl — Petitioner