Whether a pro se defendant in a confidential professional licensure disbarment proceeding has full 1st Amendment rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether a person proceeding Pro Se in defending a confidential professional licensure disbarment proceeding is vested with full 1st Amendment Rights to Freedom of Speech, including the Actual Malice standard? I. Whether the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause or the 6» Amendment right to be informed of accusations prohibit a State Supreme Court from disbarring an attorney based on a new charge and a new and unforeseeable rule interpretation raised after trial and at the end of the disbarment process? III. Whether the denial of all relevant Discovery and Trial Witnesses in a State professional licensure disbarment proceeding, which are guaranteed by applicable Rules, violates the 14th Amendment Right to Due Process of Law or the 6 Amendment Right to Confront one’s accuser and have compulsory process for favorable witnesses? IV. Whether a retaliatory and discriminatory lawyer disbarment, based on an 8+ year vigorous defense and policies and practices which base prosecution decisions on lawyer associational status, violates the 1+ Amendment rights to Freedom of Association and to Petition for Redress of Grievances and the 14th Amendment right to Equal Protection of the Laws? i