No. 23-881
Douglas Bruce v. City of Miamisburg, Ohio
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-deprivation due-process municipal-action notice property-rights section-1983 statute-of-limitations takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process allows statute of limitations on Section 1983 claim to begin without actual notice of property deprivation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether under existing due process law, the statute of limitations on a Section 1983 claim for the unconstitutional deprivation of private property can begin to run when the plaintiff has no actual notice that the municipality has taken his real property? And further, is a real property owner under an affirmative obligation to visit his property on a regular basis to ensure that a municipality has not taken his property without notice? And finally, should this Court adopt a standard nationwide statute of limitations for Section 1983 claims? 2
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent City of Miamisburg, Ohio to respond filed.
2024-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)
Attorneys
City of Miamisburg, Ohio
Christopher T. Herman — Surdyk, Dowd & Turner Co., L.P.A., Respondent
Christopher T. Herman — Surdyk, Dowd & Turner Co., L.P.A., Respondent
Douglas Bruce
Aaron Christopher Garrett — Nonprofit Legal Services of Utah, Petitioner
Aaron Christopher Garrett — Nonprofit Legal Services of Utah, Petitioner