No. 23-887
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-review magistrate-judge magistrate-review procedural-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eleventh Circuit's opinion improperly introduce the Magistrate Judge and deny due process by providing no reasoning?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Opinion of The Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, namely: “After reviewing the briefs and the record, we find no error, And we affirm the dismissal of Misquith’s second amended complaint for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s wellreasoned Report and recommendation”. 1. Introduce Impropriety in this case by mentioning the Magistrate Judge in the opinion. 2. Deny me my 14th Amendment Right to Due Process, by giving me no reasoning or guidance, while praising the reasoning of a lower court judge. : | ;
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Borrego and Palm Beach Trauma Associates to respond filed.
2024-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent St. Mary's Medical Center to respond filed.
2024-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent Health Care District of Palm Beach County to respond filed.
2024-02-13
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Eugene Misquith
Eugene Misquith — Petitioner
Health Care District of Palm Beach County
Lara Donlon — Torcivia, Donlon, Goddeau & Rubin, P.A., Respondent
Robert Borrego and Palm Beach Trauma Associates
Christopher J. King — Homer Bonner PA, Respondent
St. Mary's Medical Center
Anna Lazarus — LashGolderg, LLP, Respondent