No. 23-888
Alfredo Felipe Rasco v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure deportation-consequences guilty-plea guilty-plea-withdrawal ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel padilla-precedent padilla-v-kentucky rule-11 rule-11-violation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision to deny my C.O.A. and the district court's denial of my motion to withdraw my guilty plea contravenes this Court's pronouncement in Padilla v. Kentucky, 519 U.S. 2010
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s decision to deny my C.O.A. and the district court’s denial of my motion to withdraw my guilty plea contravenes this Court’s pronouncement:in Padilla v. Kentucky, 519 U.S. 2010. . My attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel and Rule 11 violation by the district court of the deportation consequences by pleading guilty. { | | | I
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)
2023-10-13
Application (23A334) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 21, 2023.
2023-10-11
Application (23A334) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2023 to December 21, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent