No. 23-889

In Re William B. Jolley

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-judges administrative-law constitutional-appointment due-process equal-protection merit-systems-protection-board mspb-procedure veterans veterans-rights whistleblower whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Due process-violation-in-MSPB-appeals

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I Do Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) decisions of Veteran and Whistleblower appeals fail for lack of “due process” where 5 C.F.R. § 1201.57), states “the Board will not consider matters described at 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(2) in an appeal covered by this section.”? Il Did the ultra vires act of two individual MSPB Board members creating the so called “Ratification Order” stating, “we today approve these appointments as our own under Article IT a of the Constitution,” satisfy the Supreme Court requirements for administrative judges as set | forth by the Supreme Court in Lucia v. SEC, et. seq. (App.7) I Should 38 U.S.C. § 4324 (App.3) be declared unconstitutional because it creates unequal =, protection of laws for Veterans from that which is provided by 38 U.S.C. 4 4323. (App.4) . PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR PROHIBITION William B. Jolley (pro se), the Petitioner, applies, pursuant to Section 1651, Title 28, United States Code, and Rule 20 of the Supreme Court Rules, for writs of mandamus and/or for writs of prohibition, directed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB); and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). “Petitioner's Motion To Supplement The Informal Reply Brief And Informal

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-20
Motion (23M89) for leave to proceed as a veteran Granted.
2024-01-10
MOTION (23M89) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-05
Motion (23M89) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2024-01-05
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
William B. Jolley
William B. Jolley — Petitioner
William B. Jolley — Petitioner