No. 23-890
Response Waived
Tags: bilingual-election bilingual-requirements circuit-split compassionate-release constitutional-discrimination constitutional-law due-process election-law election-requirements equal-protection equal-protection
23-88" extraordinary-compelling-reasons first-step-act language-minority mandatory-minimum-sentence national-origin sentencing-reduction voting-rights Whether non-retroactive changes in law can be 'ext
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Bilingual Election Requirements (52 U.S.C. §10503) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. §10301, et. sec.) are unconstitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Bilingual Election Requirements (52 U.S.C. §10503) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. §10301, et. sec.) by authorizing coverage and enforcement without requiring assessment of individual need to direct “remedial devices” for only certain language minority group members is unconstitutional as discriminatory to excluded classes of Non-Native English Language citizens based on race and national origin, violating Articles I, II, IV, and Amendments V, XIV, XV and XXIV of the United States Constitution. ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES There are no related cases.
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Batia Zareh
Batia Mojdeh Zareh — Dialectic Arts, LLC, Petitioner
Batia Mojdeh Zareh — Dialectic Arts, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent