whether-the-petitioner-was-falsely-arrested

Questions Presented 1. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has already established that the Petitioner did not Resist Arrest on February 3, 2018. “Hanson did not threaten any hikers or the rangers, he complied with the rangers’ commands, he did not try to run, and he did not resist the rangers.” Quoting Hanson v. U.S.A. (6th No. 21-6092 Cir.2022) NORRIS, GIBBONS, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges. 2. The Appeals Court is also in Clear Disagreement of Petitioner’s time of the Arrest that was used to establish the Petitioner’s conviction in the Lower Court. 3. The Appeal Court disagreement trumps the lower court conviction. The disagreement of arrest is nearly 45 minutes, and close to 2 miles apart from each other. 4, The Lower Court’s instructed time of arrest was established to protect against excessive force used by the arresting Rangers. 5. The Lower Court errored by instructing a false time of arrest to Jurors in the Instruction given at the 3-day trial. 6. The petitioner was never told he was under arrest, or detained on February 3rd, 2018. 7. Petitioner Hanson was just tackled to the ground by U.S. Park Rangers, and punched nearly 10 times in the back of the head before running for his safety. ii I. Questions Presented — Continued 8. The Petitioner later scheduled a traditional Jury trial to take place on August 18, 2018 in the Lower Court. 9. The Petitioner reached settlement in a case that was unrelated at the time. Case. No 175209 reached settlement on August 6th, 2018, in the Sixth Circuit of Appeals. 10. On August 8th, 2018, the Petitioner’s Jury trial was then rescheduled to take place on September 24th, 2018. 11. Trial format was then tailored for a later HECK Barring argument by the United States of America. 12. Latoyia Carpenter became aware of the outcome of Case. No 17-5209 on May of 2018. The United States of America then charged The Petitioner with new charges, and in September of 2018 Mr. Hanson was forced into a special jury/bench trial arrangement. Jurors would only decide 1 of only 7 charges brought against the petitioner. 13. The settlement of Case. No 17-5209 triggered the United States of America, and LaToyia Trotter Carpenter to enter false and perjured testimony against the Petitioner 13 days before the new trial date. See Document 27. iii I. Questions Presented — Continued 14. On September 11, 2018 Petitioner Hanson was falsely accused of possessing Methamphetamines by the United States of America. 15. No federal trial exists to cite that proceeded like the Petitioner’s jury/bench trial 16. Rangers handcuffed the Petitioner with a new set of cuffs. Rangers left the new keys attached. At trial, the respondents tricked the Lower Court and jurors to believe Hanson owned the keys Rangers left attached. 17. Jurors were told Hanson owned the set of keys, because he had a pre-planned escape from law enforcement. 18. The Respondents for United States of America knowingly gave jurors perjured testimony on multiple occasions. 19. All coming between the time of Case. No 175209 settlement, and No. 23-5166 20. Erroneous Jury Instructions concealed that the Petitioner was being tackled, and punched. iv II. Related Cases John William Hanson III v. United States of America, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 23-5166 (Jul. 13, 2023). John William Hanson III v. United States of America, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Nos. 3:18-CR-61JEM (Memorandum Opinion filed Jan. 11, 2023) (Report and Recommendation filed June 15, 2022). v Ill.