No. 23-907

Pablo Pastrana v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2024-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: brown-vs-texas constitutional-law fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-roadblocks probable-cause reasonable-suspicion roadblock search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a vehicular roadblock satisfies the standard for a reasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a vehicular roadblock satisfies the standard for a reasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, articulated in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979), when there is no evidence that it was planned or authorized by supervisory (non-field) officers or that the date and location of the roadblock was reasonably selected to achieve valid law enforcement goals.

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-02-20

Attorneys

New York
Nicole Alisa NecklesThe Bronx District Attorney Office, Respondent
Nicole Alisa NecklesThe Bronx District Attorney Office, Respondent
Pablo Pastrana
Akiva ShapiroGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Akiva ShapiroGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner