Whether the United States District Court, District of California lacked lawful jurisdiction in the case

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The United States District Court, District of California lacked lawful jurisdiction in cause no: for the reasons below: 1. The Complaint (Nonfeasance, Breach of Trust, and Restraint of Trade cause no: presents a detailed recitation of Petitioners' assertions that more than satisfies the pleading requirements of a Nonfeasance, Breach of Trust, and Restraint of Trade Challenge of the Trial Court. 2. Consideration of the Complaint, at LAW, as a whole demonstrates that said complaint meets the requirements established under the Federal Rules for a lawful challenge of the Courts error by STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Attorney General, Rob Bonta. 3. A County Recorder is required to file documents proving land ownership, especially in relation to Titles invoking Land Patent Rights originating in Treaty law. Therein, there is a difference between “Title” by Patent and “Color of Title” by Deed. 4, In reviewing a facial challenge, which contests the sufficiency of the pleadings, "the court must only consider the allegations of the complaint and documents referenced therein and attached thereto, in the light most favorable to the Petitioner NOT the alleged merits of the cause in question as it was presented to the court.