No. 23-920

Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: antitrust civil-rights due-process labor labor-market market-dominance ncaa-eligibility professional-athletics property-interest property-rights student-athlete
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-04-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do elite student-athletes preparing for professional athletic careers have a business or property interest in their NCAA eligibility?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Less than three years ago, this Court unanimously recognized that NCAA Division I student-athletes, as laborers, have a legally cognizable interest in the education-related benefits they receive as NCAA eligible student-athletes. Natl Collegiate Athletic Assoc. v. Alston, 1418. Ct. 2141 (2021). Accepting the realities of modern-day college sports that have long been overlooked in lower courts, Alston observed that the “NCAA’s Division I essentially is the relevant market for elite college football and basketball,” and that “there are no ‘viable substitutes.” Id. at 2152. Because of this market dominance, “student-athletes have nowhere else to sell their labor.” Id. at 2156 (emphasis added). A student-athlete’s eligibility to access this unparalleled market is therefore highly valuable. The question presented is: Do elite student-athletes preparing for professional athletic careers have a business or property interest in their NCAA eligibility? (i)

Docket Entries

2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent Adidas America, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2024-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2024)

Attorneys

Adidas America, Inc., et al.
William H. Taft VDebevoise & Plimpton, LLP, Respondent
William H. Taft VDebevoise & Plimpton, LLP, Respondent
Brian Bowen, II
Colin Venkat Madhira RamMcLeod Law Group LLC, Petitioner
Colin Venkat Madhira RamMcLeod Law Group LLC, Petitioner