Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the exclusion of relevant evidence of an alternative perpetrator based on a trial court's conclusion it is too speculative violate a criminal defendant's constitutional right to present a complete defense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the exclusion of relevant evidence of an alternative perpetrator based on a trial court’s conclusion it is too speculative violate a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to present a complete defense? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit No. 22-2178 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua James Duggar, Date of Final Opinion: August 7, 2023 Date of Rehearing Denial: September 28, 2023 U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas No. 5:21-CR-50014 United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Joshua James Duggar, Defendant. Date of Final Judgment: May 27, 2022
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-30
Reply of petitioner Joshua James Duggar filed.
2024-05-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-04-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 21, 2024.
2024-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2024 to May 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2024.
2024-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2024 to April 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2024)
2023-12-15
Application (23A554) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 25, 2024.
2023-12-12
Application (23A554) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 27, 2023 to February 25, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.