Whether the 'pure' form of 'Continuing Violation Doctrine' should apply to Civil Rights and Tort Claims of Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the “pure” form of “Continuing Violation Doctrine” should apply to Civil Rights and Tort Claims of Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. 2. Whether the local rule, trial judge discretion, or lack of local rule can preempt the state statutory right for an attorney to appear in court and represent her clients at hearings or trials.