Whether Ex Post Facto protections were denied by the extension of the state statute of limitations by an unforeseeable judicial interpretation of a statutory term, and whether petitioner was denied Effective Assistance of Counsel by the lack of timely briefing related to counsel's bar suspension

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Ex Post Facto protections were denied by the extension of the state statute of limitations by an unforeseeable judicial interpretation of a statutory term, and whether petitioner was denied Effective Assistance of Counsel by the lack of timely briefing related to counsel’s bar suspension. 2. Whether the complaining witness’ failure to describe the alleged illegal conduct, or to make any reasonable approximation of the alleged dates, denied petitioner the constitutional right to Notice.