No. 23-966

Oscar Amos Stilley v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure judicial-appointments judicial-assignment judicial-cross-designation judicial-ethics statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 13 consecutive cross-designations of Oklahoma district judges are 'temporary' under 28 U.S.C. 292(b)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether or not 13 consecutive cross-designations of Oklahoma district judges, with apparent intent to issue new cross-designations each year, in perpetuity, are nevertheless “temporary” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 292(b). 2. Whether a criminal defendant who is by the written admission of the government not guilty of the charge of the indictment, or of the theories of the government pretrial, may be imprisoned for an alleged violation of supervised release. 3. Whether or not a circuit court, on its own motion and own initiative, may excuse both prosecutors and judges from compliance with ethical rules and their own oaths of office. y io

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)

Attorneys

Oscar Amos Stilley
Oscar Amos Stilley — Petitioner
Oscar Amos Stilley — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent