Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Younger v. Harvis and its progeny require federal courts to abstain from adjudicating petitioners' constitutional challenges
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Younger v. Harvis, 401 U.S. 87 (1971), and its progeny require federal courts to abstain from adjudicating petitioners’ constitutional challenges to respondents’ pretrial detention of many thousands of presumptively innocent people. 2. Whether, under this Court’s precedent, legislation enacted during a lawsuit renders the asserted claims moot if the legislation does not provide the relief sought in the litigation, such that the courts could still provide the plaintiff with effectual relief. (i)
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-06
Reply of petitioners Shannon Daves, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-22
Brief of respondents Dallas County, Texas, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-11-21
Brief of respondents Judge Ernest White, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 24, 2023, for all respondents.
2023-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2023 to November 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-25
Response Requested. (Due October 25, 2023)
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-01
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2023-09-01
Brief amicus curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed.
2023-08-08
Waiver of right of respondents Judge Ernest White, et al. to respond filed.
2023-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 1, 2023)
2023-05-26
Application (22A1029) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 29, 2023.
2023-05-24
Application (22A1029) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2023 to July 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.