Question not identified.

No question identified. : Petitioner Seneca Lovett Engel respectfully requests an extension in time of sixty (60) days to file a petition for writ of certiorari. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals entered Judgment on April 11, 2023. Order denying petition for rehearing en banc and panel hearing was entered on May 18, 2023. The petitioner seeks review of the judgment of the circuit court affirming the judgment of the district court in this cause. Attached is copy of the opinion of the circuit court. The order denying the petition for rehearing en banc and panel rehearing is also attached. An extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari is justified for the following reasons: 1. The deadline to file a petition for certiorari is August 16, 2023. 2. Counsel for the petitioner will be in a jury trial that is scheduled for five days commencing August 14, 2023. 3. Counsel is preparing for trial and will be in the middle of trial on the filing deadline. Dated: August 16, 2023. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Tucker J. Volesky Tucker J. Volesky Counsel for Petitioner Seneca Lovett Engel CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 16, 2023, I filed the foregoing “Petitioner’s Application to Extend Time to File a Petition for Writ of Certiorari” with the Clerk of Court for the United States Supreme Court and served the document on counsel for all parties as listed below, through the United States Postal Service by first-class mail, postage prepaid: Alex M. Hagen 200 East 10" Street, Suite 200 Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104 (605) 336-0828 Counsel for Derek Engel Lisa Hansen-Marso Nicolas Ramos 300 S. Main Ave., P.O Box 5015 Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117 (605) 336-2424 Counsel for Miller Police Department; City of Miller, South Dakota; Jim Henson; Shannon Speck; John and Jane Does of the Miller Police Department /s/ Tucker J. Volesky Counsel for Petitioner Gnuited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 22-2549 Seneca Lovett Engel Plaintiff Appellant v. Derek Engel; Miller Police Department; City of Miller, South Dakota; Jim Henson, Miller Police Department, officially and individually; Shannon Speck, Miller Police Department, officially and individually; Various John and Jane Does, Miller Police Department, officially and individually Defendants Appellees Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota Central Submitted: March 23, 2023 Filed: April 11, 2023 [Unpublished] Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Appellate Case: 22-2549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2023 Entry ID: 5263798 South Dakota resident Seneca Lovett Engel appeals the district court’s' dismissal of her pro se complaint for failure to state a claim. After careful de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 'The Honorable Roberto Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. 2Appellate Case: 22-2549 Page:2 Date Filed: 04/11/2023 Entry ID: 5263798 Case 3:21-cv-03020-RAL Document 39 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #: 377 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No: 22-2549 Seneca Lovett Engel Appellant v. Derek Engel, et al. Appellees Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota Central (3:21-cv-03020-RAL) ORDER The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for rehearing by the panel is also denied. May 18, 2023 Order Entered at the Direction of the Court: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. /s/ Michael E. Gans Appellate Case: 22-2549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2023 Entry ID: 5278435