Question not identified.

No question identified. : Document-8 1).pdf USCA Appeal: 22-1506 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/25/2023 + Pg: 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 1100 East Main Street, Suite 501, Richmond, Virginia 23219 August 25, 2023 LOCAL RULE 40(d) NOTICE No. 22-1506, Inre: Metcalf TO: Claudia Metcalf “Ron David Metcalf We are in receipt of your papers in this case. This court's Local Rule 40(d) states that, except for timely petitions for rehearing en banc, cost and attorney fee matters, and other matters ancillary to the filing of an application for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, the office of the clerk shall not receive motions or other papers requesting further relief in a case after the court has denied a petition for rehearing or the time for filing a petition for rehearing has expired. Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 40(d), no further action will be taken in this matter by this court. A petition for writ of certiorari may be filed in the Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20543-0001. Information on filing a petition for writ of certiorari is available on the Supreme Court’s website, or from the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office at (202) 479-3000. Rickie Edwards, Deputy Clerk 804-916-2702 lof 1 8/25/2023, 12:01 PM Document-7.pdf USCA4 Appeal: 22-1506 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 35 THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Re. Application No. 22A1131 ( from 22-1506 In re. Metcalf United States Supreme Court ( Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ( from ( Western Fed. District Court of N.C. Ron Metcalf, et. ux. Vv. US. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY OF EXECUTION OF EVICTION, AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Ron and Claudia Metcalf, parents, legal guardians, advocates, and Relative as Provider employees of Abound Health LLC, North Carolina, of D.J.M., a disabled, incompetent adult, who has been a N.C. Innovations Medicaid Waiver client since Nov. 2016; In accordance with the instructions of the U.S. Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 1 of 35 8/25/2023, 12:02 PM Document-7.pdf USCA4 Appeal: 22-1506 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 35 (See immediately following 6 pages) we hereby file this above-stated Motion, requesting that this be considered immediately by one or more Judges of the 4th Circuit C.0.A., and an Order be issued A.S.A.P., as it isan Extremely Urgent Matter. The enclosed pages are exactly what has been presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, to avoid confusion. It was our pro se understanding that, after the Mandate had been issued, that we could not file any other Motions re. Case # 22-1506. It is now our understanding, not being accepted Appellate Attorneys, that this now reopens the Caseand that we may once again move this Court for a Stay of Mandate from U.S. Western District Court of North Carolina Senior Judge Reidinger’s (permanent, criminal) Gatekeeper Sanction Order. The Mandate is a secondary issue; as is our Demand for a First Appeal Rights Attorney. Unlawfully evicting us from our home of 5 % years and taking possession of all of our belongings without a due process Hearingis the IMMEDIATE CONTROVERSY; but by no means are we waiving any previous arguments. We move this Court to incorporate all the following charges arguments statutes and opinions into consideration by one or more 4*h Circuit C.0.A. Judges for merit, findings of fact, and conclusions of law, as presented to Chief Justice Roberts of the United States Supreme Court of America. Liberty Solutions L.L.C. has already received Service of this exact same filing in the U.S. Supreme Courtand has not submitted a Reply Brief, as far as we know. 2 of 35 8/25/2023, 12:02 PM Document-7.pdf USCA4 Appeal: 22-1506 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2023 Pg: 3 of 35 Respectfully Submitted, Ron and Claudia Metcalf 169 Atoah St. Robbinsville N.C. 28771 407-401-2445 3 of 35 8/25/2023, 12:02 PM Document Rd appeal: 22-150