Moses Estrada v. Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County, et al.
Question not identified.
No question identified. : EccAcation OF Moses EsTRADA tT, Moses Extpapa declace: le I Om The eT lonec for Case a $2799 3% ta 2 Califrcnin Supreme Couct traf was. denied & 14,202), Bane Oh Tune aud n ACTION ot 4 wor tt of mandate before the Court of Appeal foucth Appellate District bivisioen Two Case To heve personal knowledge & Hh, fac ed tw is declaretion and We called +o tech DT contd and weuld est > Gach facts, 4. requested and vecewed thevah «2 matt cued Cbce 217) focm “PRroauty Libeacy user (peu) ¢ yest AwO Declaration" Ptu states from August It 2023 uch Septembse (2, 7023, For the purpose of cubac a Z “49 v . , . a fal a 20 21 2ai| weit ef cerhorac. 23 5, CT have vrecewed a “Fac li BA Libran, Sehedule August 20622 " t+ chowe thet the law Vibrary would be Closed on Auguyt 21 2023, 24 25 26 27 6. TL _have hoon informed , Geynior law Libraria 28 Ms. Licones at + aw \ibear wi be closed on _Segfambe 4A 2023 dus oO om Fedeca| hol ida . 7. TF have been nturmed thet azecorde 0 department . the fut ¢ of Couct -oldered deadlines allow b an in te b S. T beline ¢ x wil ot be able tb Fl Dre pare writ becavse ofa Jack ch accese to tu law tre ¢ ibe ace. ZL declare under pewalt, of perjucy unde laus of » Great ciate of Calibers + the feresoine is ue , of 4 Cofce é d l declacsh on was executed August 3] 2023, rEg o> A eee ecg Moses ESTRADA 10 11 12 13 14 “49 20 21 22 | 23 24 25 26 27 28