Question not identified.

No question identified. : MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR FILING WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1. The (“Applicant”) Lawrence Kingsley intends to seek a Writ of Certiorari pursuant to this court’s Rule 10. 2. However, a crush of other work, in combination with need to verify the record in Louisiana, where the applicant has not lived since 1977, has placed severe time constraints on him,! 3. Nothing was awarded to either side nor to a non-party, Crowell & Owens.” The applicant thus is the only aggrieved party, and no one will be harmed by the requested enlargement of time. 4. The applicant therefore asks for a 60 day extension for filing the Writ of Certiorari. 5. As shown by the attachments, the Louisiana Supreme Court, the court of last resort, denied the appeal on Feb. 14, 2023 and on April 25, 2023 denied the applicant’s timely Motion for Reconsideration. ' This case arises from a testamentary trust which was mishandled and devastated by the The ultimate issue on appeal is whether the case should be restored to the docket in the Louisiana trial court on the basis of conflicting decisions of federal and state courts and extreme departure from the accepted, usual course of judicial proceedings. ? One of the issues in this appeal is the failure of the lower courts to restrain Crowell & Owens from pleadings in this case. Though a non-party, Crowell & Owens never filed a motion to intervene, never had the right to intervene, and long ago passed the deadline for even attempting to intervene. 6. The April 25 decision, of course, extended the deadline for a writ of certiorari application in this Honorable Court, Dated: July 5, 2023 Lancaster, PA Respectfully submitted, Lawrence Kingsley 2161 West Ridge Drive Lancaster, PA 17601 646-543-2226