Question not identified.

No question identified. : !) The PETIT en 2% motlen For a nperl te Thi'r ErTieract The dJiive 6s (G-/12422 fowtT vee CErTforacs The ba Aw petitiener wsby TAI" CE py wether 30 say x The Cemarny Timmy Filing this nara j 3 { ’ pnsutttaent, petrtene (cece? +h patke+ seot doth 2023 To AN Sum an noleg vate pRasentepon Of th pe Tt wee Avavremt 3 oy Appel dle te pci ten CONSTRAINTS. To Recfew The @ preesh ot Wis Aeoumt TT PRoceco IMA Gemma PAV PSo/5 2) Petson Seeunty awl Lay bi beaey Opec Howe / Paes, Puli, And Pe Cones Kev rreve rent, Dodeles avi baw L bere SARU.ce ane/ ANS SAaace, 4) Bee Petitronee jo untvained ny Phe er tte. oP law, awd asa Cesult he Wai @ sec help ot CTH Pwnrtia or Cartihed Pumate lLwrlaks rt Ae VYSTITI TIEN Whee he vy presen, PM@RLER Atel Ss) This Fae, Hx bys erly Shr Csvth ef Mivedts Lan~ Clerks wi aver a pprlation of App ro yz rete ly [\W in wrt G) She RESCIND ewTOD will be Scrvel pn Cipy ct P ETit*levee rete foe CATES far of Tie’ As DN ate/ iN Re i Coppoteted cogtbiuts of SZC Vee . Sy This Aaeility bas owly thru Ceatthed INnwtQ Law clerks To ASSISHtA 4p uletey Of OPV mAb 1000 jumatys. Or The Respondéar Or will Be Sseved A ty Of ty PEA eng motion for CTEM OM | 6F Tw As suds ented ny He fa, teRp cratel CECT Berte of Seve. Whee Exe | petitioner ve ves thap Thi Cort ENTEZ a grler Te yuk And EXTENSION yf Tiny Ae ve y)s Unt] 11-11-2023 wa whet Pry owe DEen*s Trt ww prose Ary motiew an FDOG 0) B07 & GH meevel/e. co. & S/@¢ &2Ee// CGmetllls 2404 ~ $$ S20 F declare Unuvse rene bh vf £45 Urey ther ca Have Cwd Th fort orn) Nn otion ot Facts pel tre Anets 9 tate/ how Yecl4ar-t the rre-tioy ry bans % Led ow goed f NVA PII / Ve IGtoxdte C2e7Le owe-~ fe CERT ate df 32a i"ce ZT HeesRy CERTIFY, Th2AY £4 Troe nud ON 2 wpy Of the Fotesginy metfrow Dae heen p eel! wee Wy Hhawe/s ef 70)! Reem ottrerad s at barn, low COV |S Cte SH TUT AVVEE Ko marlin, WA US. may/yy : UE. Dit Lour+ Cheistoprez Siree South bey Dist, Florich fe 38S Stat #1 erAey Ooo JOO W. My Army AVE (108.87 5. Cu HA.) PrAr\ Fla 32/95 fort Lavilecile OEE ee aa e ATTemy of Reported, I@ Ete U/ Day 3 3/¥o5 JA \~Ez A B20%3 & D8 Te CDP £7 Wow = BY, Se USCA11 Case: 21-10819 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 03/01/2023 Page: 1 of 9 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals Hor the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-10819 Non-Argument Calendar CHARLES LAWN, versus SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, SGT. SCHUTHIESS, Martin C.L., OFFICER HARVEY, USCA11 Case: 21-10819 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 03/01/2023 Page: 2 of 9 2 Opinion of the Court 21-10819 Martin C.I., Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv-14249-RLR Before WILLIAM PryoR, Chief Judge, and Newsom and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles Lawn, a Florida prisoner, appeals the summary judgment in favor of two correctional officers, Sergeant Schultheiss and Officer Harvey, and against Lawn’s complaint that they used excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment when restraining Lawn while he was having a seizure. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court ruled that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity because the undisputed record established that the officers, acting within their discretionary authority, restrained Lawn because they perceived he was under the influence of drugs and that the force they used was not applied maliciously or sadistically to cause harm. We affirm. USCA11 Case: 21-10819 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 03/01/2023 Page: 3 of 9 21-10819 Opinion of the Court 3 I. BACKGROUND For decades, Lawn has experienced seizures due to a traumatic brain injury. On July 9, 2015, Lawn was in his cell when he began to experience one of these seizures and informed his cellmate, who called for help. When Sergeant Schultheiss and Officer Harvey arrived with other prison and medical staff, Lawn was convulsing on the floor. Lawn was transported to the prison medical un