Whether a pro se litigant's constitutional claims regarding First Amendment rights to religious exercise and government petition can be preserved for appellate review when page limitations potentially restrict full articulation of substantive claims

Whether I, Petitioner Meghan Kelly averred good cause requiring this Court to grant my request for leave to exceed the page limit given: 1. the voluminous amount of claims I must assert and not waive to prevent the vitiation of my fundamental rights, and other asserted claims, not merely my licenses to practice law, most importantly my private 1s‘ Amendment exercise of religious belief in Jesus Christ, my private 1st Amendment right to petition the government regarding government incited substantial burdens upon my religious exercise of belief in Jesus as God not money as God; and my private 1*t Amendment right to speech contained in my petitions applicable to the Defendants pursuant to the 14" Amendment; the irreparable injury to me in terms of loss of Constitutional rights and other claims should pages be denied; Justice Alito denied my second application for time I require to tighten up and more effectively and concisely draft my petitions; the Third Circuit Court’s mandate indicates my claims were not included on the record when I asserted them on the record and must include my verbatim claims and attach the records to prevent irreparable injury to me in terms of vitiation of my private Constitutional rights and other claims based in part on an error of fact by the Appellate court to show the facts were presented and preserved for appeal and included in my appeal in the appellate court. Some of my claims will be vitiated by statute of limitations including but not limited to violations of my 1‘* Amendment right to petition without government retaliation but for the exercise of my right to petition the courts to alleviate a government incited substantial pg. ii burden upon attorneys facing economic hardship during a global pandemic for exemptions on bar dues filed January and February 2020. Other claims approach the statute of limitations, I must assert my claims now since poverty and my religious beliefs against debt create an obstacle so great as to deny me access to the courts should I be compelled in bad faith to start all over again as I continue to fight other reciprocal cases or threats of reciprocal cases, and the Constitutional issues and claims below must be addressed to protect not only me, but others beyond me from professional government backed persecution based on eliminating people’s license to buy or sell based on exercise of fundamental rights, specifically in my case my religious belief in Jesus. pg. iii