Whether the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits California from retroactively modifying a prior conviction to enhance a defendant's sentence under a new habitual criminal statute

No question identified. : APPLICATION TO JUSTICE KAGAN FOR GRANT LEAVE TO EXCESS PABE LIMIT IN THE ATTACHED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIDRARY Kppltcant CARLOS MARTINE S +p lees te Justice Ka an the Ho novable Circuit Court dustvce, eycsuan te Rules 22.3 an 33.4) bor an order granbug Applreant request Loe leave +, file his Pel hven Por a writ of Cectrecacy exceeding the page lathe ven oF 40 pages. Rule 33.1) peconts App Weant ke address qu app Wealvon to a circuit rug hee even Though nor ma lly an a lca kin to exceed the age limit werld nal wia Creat the abtentvon of the Court Ue Rule 33,1(d), but im this case it ts necessary to € led the Pet tron for a wrt of cerhocari exceed: 40 pages becavset 4. In this case even before Bla g the la bormatron document charg ing Applicant of the charg es and prior convvehans allegabvon the Shite of California (Calsfocnta) beg in Viola beng the VS, Consh by bron and Ap eant consh hy tional reg yy ts b transfor min or se pa~ ratin Qa sin Yor convirehun of Kwe burglaries tnto two separate new Sirikes prive convichon under a new 1494 habswal ¢ riminal stalvte, whreh erly rial l under the annexed CaleCeara law (Penal Code Sechien Léa) at thet year ae 1992 g vali Pred as only a single seriovs prvor convect on and if wes debmed asa Seriovs prio: con viction not as CaltFocn ra aftte-wards ehan ed the debsnr tro awd upgraded the criminality of con duct ot 4 haf Secvous pee convietien and ¢ hanged also the skandard of vaishment From Five years maxtrmven vider the ameyed P.C.5 667@) +o he miarmym of 2S years te Wwetn priser which 4 Iweant served already more than as Years and waiting fo, the Cah Board of Pacole Heacm s’drsccetion to be released on acele, so simceé the Pilong charyés agamst Ap lvcant to the date the Cah Superior court Imposed 3i years 46 jr Fe sevtence on the current convictroy £,, cemm ths a sivig le dul¢ lige aud ta King ine xecount the FPR ener convecyvon Fy Wwlornta F slated all the quacantees at hop Ireant to havea Fave trral and a Fair seencing hearing and Fecconsevance it ts hecéssary Fo ex plarn to thes Court she by shep in which all the clauses of the VS Coushty hen were vio'labed, a Fucthee More, a fundamental WIS oH fe: Vnwgedt of jvshree occurred in thrs cas €, first as stabed above A linea F Was H vrchw o FisCarciage of jvetrvee by having ap pom Fed av ineffechve counsel at teva and an vu fay trial and thoes al be, the Cal Pern ven Courts aud federal covvts denied cevrew of the mecits of this caSe, speci Freal) Aeplreant WAS teaeped b Calf fyi e, aud the Federel Dishecet Coury when Ca lifecuce alleged iu the Federal cow’ that blrcant Racled to en~ haust three clatms avd assured the Loderal cout thet A lecaut ha availa dle rewedres a ¢ exhaustion and. qt hen come back 4, federal euurt aud reble q new Federal pehtron, Ihe Covel ‘ve tvvo ephion ste ygplicantdelete the three clatws and proceed with the fest Pehher or qo and ‘ ex hausl remeches. eva come Lack, The he sreght elected te rs? aud exhaust and ceme hack, Atteexhaus hing App \veant Bled 4 new Federal Pebhon aud Calvornia alleged that the second Pebhen was vikimely, however alter hwo years of Wha tiéw the Federal cour held thet the Pehhen WAS tiaael ort December 2003 and was submbled Cor decision, At this 2063 year ahd prevovsly on 200) this Court deeded Duncan y. WalKer holm, that 4 peadin Federal pek tiers jn federal Covet did tolled the awe year frucbaton a€ asus C.3 FA4Y EKA) and Cal ferave, was presumed thet it had Krow— ledge of the Don can decision but eleted not to present the defense— lini tation, however the Federal disterct abused oCiks déses ebron and sua sponte disrissed the second pektonas untrmel. on Novem ber 2005 two years affethe cause was svleutted Gur dectston and dherefere ts necessary to pet all these Packs in the Peblrew Per wietk of Derlinpayt dhvs case 6S aw ekhracsdimary case in which A itemet has been a victim of mnscarrya ge of Juste S6ILE She fi. Ins oF charges +5 duly 42, 4033 im wheeh Ca