Quaysean Tikii Williams v. Oklahoma
Whether a criminal defendant may seek an extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari when counsel has not been diligent in preparing the petition
No question identified. : KeTAawt petitioner ia. wnafyle +o. Ele. the pet HanF3r a weit of eortiacucy within the designetect — time pee rod BeCouses a. Petite BNLCIS A. Pr Zdner preceetling wa) “this : EHUEL PO EQ; — L. The paZan. i corks. the houcs. Ni thy. oslo ely _ petittonec moy have OCS FO IHS PISO lay Ui ban and bila _teigat mectecial Zootdnad tAere every (Contec 26 Thud Ke 122s, presented: Lot bis 5 CBSE OCR ample ao j—— ——s —EE d, Thect peti ki epechas allay Hef Lees | ledge. be the lovee: | Hhete toe, ar acleliteorrel peau aioe wil neeessary £3 pettit 0078 “fe PREPALR fi petstien. foc a wWatof certian Seta ee 7 ; The. owe counsel, iieeiidis ee (eel (abemea, hus. bok been 26 7 IES © acth’ng this 2xtensi a uUest, A, 1 Oy e cespondent will nok be prajudieed by the. extension, Aa& no deodléne is. scheduled — _ and ne deadline well be impacted, — Wherefore, petitioner respectfully quests lth llicert ste, aru Mier a. Bi ty Léa) of eu Lxtenetod ef -+ime, Fram aod ater Navamber | canny | sich afl a geftion atte ee | Respeat fully Submitter, Biffle #200 es ntioy Will ONS i