Whether a pro se petitioner's request for an extension of time to file a certiorari petition constitutes a legally cognizable claim for extraordinary relief under Supreme Court procedural rules
No question identified. : Qoee ex AWed STANFORD, Pevtrrede® PRo Se, Respecx Ful seeks AN ExTASlod OF Wile To Mire a celyef CeanteRaAre> i wilts CAA | poksy AIT WO ScG 13.57, AA SIRMOTS sAE Fetlowag Gees cavse MS Sapporrde leoF, RYonqmadtw Wag edvaden [A safls cAse of Sepved Beis, 2.023, wile Refoee, IS accoRaadcese Wirt SeK 13.1, THE Perivoners Weiw ef CetrictaRits ade od. Decew Bee PB Peas ; rs : a gern Catse Ragen od rhe begat Couplenrias SA its exerpTion aL CARL pddoleag NK Muli Vion Scth @ Cowie sal AgtesmtesS DA Ne RisTR RN Cou ONS cong resshoa ally Laven fy ats piensa COMBNED WIA VAL Lega Resedechl AJM DocdwledT & brag — -. CodsSTRAL ATS. olibkel Ads commodplace AT A WAAR atu a | co SHOOERY PEATE NTA RY WAT AS SVE R= p Rese. RAL Tiss ee er Yeeledce an Respays ive pectoras.oF locktedd, te. oo Permioter Respeen Wily secha on exwevstoy of LO Nays, ; a Fe Beary 18,2023. Dares Ocwabre lo, 2°13 + t fi + Be Ke. 1934 RespcccTailly SNA aiTreh,——§ Ro tear Ved STANhoeS—_ Ecc Colsmad,V.8.2 TE _cotems) Cloetna ———___ Rasa\