Whether the Due Process Clause protects a pro se litigant's right to file federal court pleadings despite disability and procedural challenges

No question identified. File: Total Pages: 1 AY , Via U.S. Mail: Extremely Urgent.to: Chief Justice Roberts, Jr., as Administrator, U.S. Supreme Court & also’ tos Scott S. Harris, Clerk & for Roberts, Jr. as Administrator to forvard a -copy of this matter to? Associate Justices: From: R.JKulick in Pro Per, 38122 Village 38, Camarillo, CA 93012: Your most Honorable Roberts, Jr. as Administrator: 1) I, R.JdKulick, declare under the penalty of perjury that everything in this matter below is true & correct to the best of my knowledge & belief & abilities (evidence in support given prior that suffering under ADA of 1990 & its side-effects from tiedications shich n more than ever doing anything or going anyshere for anything painful medical hardships—on a pain scale 1 to 10 a level 8 daily-unable to salk let alone enough time & energy to avoid COVID-19 exposure aith seak imm system as elderly senior-taken three booster shots-confined a lot to ON unity home bedrest & lifelong 6s¢ Dyslexia condition-obstacle & have no computer nor knowledge -ho#w to use one, excuse any typo errors-Dyslexia): Signed: R.dKulick if Dated: /4-7-23 : Subject : EMI oF Tine correspondance to: RORTS = Jr. 2. In RE: Mr. Scott S. Harris letter dated’ 10-2-23 in rare Pepacte cone sHlono Atel et al, No. 24-7554 Request Extension of Time until uspc, Central District of CA, Case Kulick v. U.S. Supreme . Court, et al, has a definitive USDC. ruling & USCA-9 definitive: ruling & U.S. Supreme Court definitive ruling.This case matter denying forma pauperis has already been accepted prior & placed on docket 5-(6-23. Im RE: Rule 33.1, not applicable, since already docketed’ too & its RE: has to do sith "translation" was done in English. Please note: in RE: Ms. Lisa Nesbitt's letter dated 9-20-23 in RE: Articlé III of Constitution, about "jurisdiction" does not exist in the Constitution. See Proof Of Service dated. 40-5-23 to U:S. Supreme Court, et al, sith Three Motions in RE: usDC, Case #06474. "Rules" are not ratified in State legislatures & are not in the. Constitution, rendering them not applicable! 3. Kulick like millions of others rec'd Honorable Discharge from the U.S. military. We put our lives on the line for our Constitution We ‘were guaranteed as citizens the rights to equality & fairness & Due Process shich Kulick has been denied..We sere also promised life liberty & pursuit of happiness in-the Declarationof Independaen . Here too, Kulick is being denied. ~ , 4. Let us not forget that the “original inten "g"living intent" by our founders must not be ignored by any judiciary system under the U.S. Rule of Law. Which has been high-jacked & .jack-booted by the two political partys in the Senate nominations for Justices of our’. federal courts. Adams & Jefferson & Chief Justice John Marshall, ‘all had-a-hand in this. Which resulted in the idealogy(s) of these two political parties being imbedded in the opinions of sitting federal Justices. That's a violation of the Constitution & in part Kulick's litigation(s) to set right the violations he has cited. However, Kulick does not doubt the honorability of our federal Justices just their unfortunate hard-wsired "idealogy" az the corner-stone of their opinions. But, on its face, we have a racketeering entity taking plate here. When you boil everything done to the reality in the dire consequences of. "opinions" based on "Idealogys". How does this get reconciled shen the fox is in charge of the chicken-coop? Which is the case that Kulick is up against in his "litigations" to set things right!!! R.J. Kulick /) , . Submission dated: /* OFF SUP EES OF THE on, CEIVED OCT 2 0 2023 EME CounT git ce