Whether a pro se litigant's repeated filing of vexatious legal actions can constitute an abuse of judicial process warranting sanctions

No question identified. : Respectfully, a7 eS /s/ Towaki Komatsu Towaki Komatsu Page 2 of 2 S.D.N.Y.-NY.C. 22-cv-9080 Swain, C.J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15" day of August, two thousand twenty-three. Towaki Komatsu, Petitioner, v. 23-654 Urban Pathways, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities, et al., Respondents. In 2021, this Court entered a leave-to-file sanction against Petitioner. See Komatsu v. The City of New York, 2d Cir. 21-511, doc. 92. Petitioner now moves for leave to file this appeal. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED because the appeal does not depart from Petitioner’s “prior pattern of vexatious filings.” See Jn re Martin-Trigona, 9 F.3d 226, 229 (2d Cir. 1993). FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court In The Supreme Court Of The United States No. TOWAKI KOMATSU, PETITIONER, v. URBAN PATHWAYS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1, Towaki Komatsu, am the pro se petitioner and declare under the penalty of perjury on 10/21/23 that I caused a copy of my request for a 60-day extension of time to submit a petition for a writ of certiorari to this Court to be sent on October 21, 2023 via e-mail to a respondent listed below. Date: October 21, 2023 /s/ Towaki Komatsu on Mag Towaki Komatsu |. Respondent: Anthony M. Gonzalez Mailing address: Process Serve Inc. 117-01 127" St., Ste. 863 South Ozone Park, NY 11420 Page | of 1 In The Supreme Court Of The United States No. TOWAKI KOMATSU, PETITIONER, Vv. URBAN PATHWAYS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Towaki Komatsu, am the pro se petitioner and declare under the penalty of perjury on 10/21/23 that I caused copies of my 10/21/23 request for a 60-day extension to submit a petition for a writ of certiorari to this Court to be sent on October 21, 2023 via e-mail to those who are listed below who are the respondents and/or their counsel. Date: October 21, 2023 /s/ Towaki Komatsu Len Towaki Komatsu 1. Counsel: Corporation Counsel of the City of New York E-mail address: Mailing address: New York City Law Department 100 Church St. NY, NY 10007 Respondents represented (names are separated by semicolon characters): The City of New York; Steven Banks; Barbara Beirne; Kristen Benjamin-Solis; Martha Calhoun; Marin Gerber; Allison Gill-Lambert; Gary Jenkins; Joni Kletter; Jeffrey Mosczye; Molly Park; Pinny Ringel; Ann Marie Scalia 2. Counsel: Barbara Underwood Page 1 of 2 E-mail address: Mailing address: Division of Appeals & Opinions Office of the Attorney General 28 Liberty Street New York, NY 10005 Respondent represented: Nancy Bannon; Anthony Cannataro; Lyle Frank; Shorab Ibrahim; Lawrence Marks; Nigel Marks; Maura Noll; Samuel Spitzberg; Daniel Tietz . Counsel: Pennisi, Daniels & Norelli, LLP E-mail address: ETavel@DNCTLaw.com Mailing address: 97-77 Queens Blvd. Rego Park, NY 11374 Respondents represented: Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC; Allison Heilbraun; Harold Rosenthal; Eric Tavel . Counsel: Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc. E-mail address: Mailing address: 1075 Grand Concourse, Suite 1B Bronx, NY 10452 Respondents represented: Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc., Julio Manjarrez . Employee and representative of Urban Pathways, Inc.: Lisa Lombardi E-mail address: Mailing address: 575 8th Ave. l6th Fl., NY, NY 10018 Respondents represented: Urban Pathways, Inc.; Ronald Abad; Sharon Coates; Gary Cohen; Lisa Lombardi; Andrew Nastachowski; Kishea Paulemont; Ariana Saunders; Frederick Shack; Nancy Southwell Page 2 of 2