No. 23A470
Amici (5)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: abortion emergency-medical-treatment federal-preemption medical-procedure preliminary-injunction state-law
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state may enforce a law restricting certain medical procedures related to abortion when such law conflicts with federal emergency medical treatment requirements
Docket Entries
2024-01-05
Application (23A470) referred to the Court.
2024-01-03
Letter to the Clerk from Applicant Idaho filed.
2023-12-01
Reply of applicant Idaho filed.
2023-11-30
Response to application from respondent United States filed.
2023-11-29
Brief amicus curiae of St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd. filed.
2023-11-27
Response to application (23A470) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 3 p.m. (EST) on November 30, 2023.
2023-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of Indiana, et al. filed.
2023-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of Advancing American Freedom, Inc. filed.
2023-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Faith and Family filed.
2023-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of Catholic Health Care Leadership Alliance, et al. filed.
2023-11-20
Application (23A470) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Advancing American Freedom, Inc.
Catholic Health Care Leadership Alliance, Catholic Bar Association, and Catholic Benefits Association
Brennan Tyler Brooks — Thomas More Society, Amicus
Brennan Tyler Brooks — Thomas More Society, Amicus
St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.
Lindsay C. Harrison — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
Lindsay C. Harrison — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
State of Idaho
Joshua Nathaniel Turner — ldaho Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
Joshua Nathaniel Turner — ldaho Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
States of Indiana, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent