No. 23A601

Shannon Donoho v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-02
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: child-pornography federal-criminal-law photographic-evidence sentencing-guidelines sexually-explicit-conduct statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the definition of 'sexually explicit conduct' in federal child pornography statutes turns on objective characteristics of the depicted images or the subjective intent of the photographer

Question Presented (from Petition)

is of exceptional importance. The panel majority ignored the clear command of the statutory text: “sexually explicit conduct” turns on characteristics of the conduct depicted in the images or videos and not on the photographer’s subjective sensibilities. The issue is consequential. Every year, federal courts sentence close to 2,000 defendants for offenses incorporating the relevant definition of “sexually explicit conduct.” U.S. Sent’g Comm’n, Federal Sentencing of Child Pornography: Production Offenses 17 (2021). And sentences for this category of offense are severe. Mr. Donoho was sentenced to over 17 years of imprisonment— and his sentence is no aberration. 4. A 14-day extension of time within which to file a certiorari petition is reasonable and necessary. a. Additional time is needed because undersigned counsel was only recently

Docket Entries

2024-01-02
Application (23A601) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until January 25, 2024.
2023-12-28
Application (23A601) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 11, 2024 to January 25, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

Shannon R. Donoho
E. Joshua RosenkranzOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
E. Joshua RosenkranzOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent