No. 23A607

Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Texas

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-02
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: border-patrol federal-preemption immigration-enforcement sovereign-immunity state-tort-law supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supremacy Clause precludes a state from using tort law to restrain federal Border Patrol agents from carrying out their federally authorized immigration enforcement activities at the international border

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. :

Docket Entries

2024-01-22
Application (23A607) referred to the Court.
2024-01-22
Application (23A607) to vacate injunction presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The December 19, 2023 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 23-50869, is vacated. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would deny the application to vacate injunction.
2024-01-17
Second supplemental brief from respondent Texas filed.
2024-01-15
Second supplemental brief of applicant Department of Homeland Security, et al. filed.
2024-01-13
Supplemental brief of respondent Texas filed.
2024-01-12
Supplement Brief from Applicants filed.
2024-01-10
Reply of applicant Department of Homeland Security, et al. filed.
2024-01-10
Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
2024-01-09
Response to application from respondent Texas filed.
2024-01-03
Response to application (23A607) requested by Justice Alito, due by 5 p.m. (EST) on January 9, 2024.
2024-01-03
Letter to the Clerk from Applicants filed.
2024-01-02
Application (23A607) to vacate injunction pending appeal, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Petitioner
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Christopher J. HajecImmigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus
State of Texas
Aaron Lloyd NielsonOffice of the Texas Attorney General, Respondent