Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses prohibit a state court from arbitrarily granting or denying late-filed petitions for leave to appeal based on discriminatory practices

here is whether Illinois may, inconsistent with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, administer this statute so as to deny adequate appellate review to the poor while granting such review to all others.” 12. For instance as to violation of Equal Access to Justice and Equal protection under the law, and discriminative jurisprudence, the Illinois Supreme court granted Segal to file PLA 63 days late and likewise granted late filing of PLA instanter to so many other multiple Petitioners, including like in Segal, Morris B. Chapman Associates v. Kitzman 193 Ill. 2d 560 ; 739 N.E.2d 1263; ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahan , 237 Ul. 2d 526 (Il. 2010); Wauconda Fire v. Stonewall Orchards , 214 Ml. 2d 417 (Ill. 2005) People v. Ford, 198 HL. 2d 68 (Hl. 2001) 13. The appeal in the instant case to the Illinois Supreme Court is triggered by judicial abuses of a corrupt lower court judge in Cook county who ‘planted’ a REMOVED state case to Federal court which was NEVER remanded, and after a year of REMOV