Question not identified.
No question identified. : TO: Mr. Samuel Alito, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Circuit Justice for the Third Circuit APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 13.5 of the Rules of this Court, I (Mr. M. Hillman) am requesting a 60-day extension of time, within which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari , up to and including Monday, October 2, 2023. JURIDICTION Pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1254 (1), this Court will have jurisdiction over any timely filed petition for a writ of certiorari. Under Rules 13.1, 13.3 and 30.1 of the Rules of this Court, a petition for a writ of certiorari is currently due to be filed on or before August 2, 2023. In accordance with Rule 13.5, this application is being filed more than 10 days in Advance of the filing date for the petition for a writ of certiorari. JUDGMENT SOUGHT TO BE REVIEWED The judgment for which review is sought is Hillman v. Collingdale Borough et al, No. 22-2259 and 22-2260, Opinion, Order, rehearing Denial (attached). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied my Motion for Rehearing (en banc) on May 4, 2023. REASONS JUSTIFYING AN EXTENSION OF TIME 1. Prior to the Rehearing Denial. I filed another Complaint against two of the Respondents (filed thru the PA. PUC) and I have been occupied litigating those issues, up to the present time. I am contending, that after our Electric and Gas Utilities were shutoff; there remained the flow of Gas to the Apartment, which is Very Dangerous. 1) Therefore, I complained of this Dangerous issue during litigation in Federal court, with no response at all, <0 I was forced to file the Complaints. (Aqua, C-2023-3038201) (Peco Energy C-2023-3038204). Our area has suffered a number of house explosions recently, not to mention, the 1B People Killed in the Philadelphia House Fire. 2. Likewise, I have another open-matter that was held up during the covid pandemic; the initial hearing occurred simultaneously with the third circuit litigation process, which again requires my attention. 3. Finally, this case raises extraordinary questions regarding clearly established federal law ( w/ amending complaints) as construed by this Court and other Circuits. See Smith v Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-50 (1992) and Noll v. Carlson, 809 F. 2d 1446, 1448-49 (9" cir.1987 ) and Flynn v. Department of Corrections 739 F. App’x 132, 136 (3d Cir. 2018) (Per Curiam) and the Third Circuit substituted its own Rules (a panel dissent) for the District Court’s judgment perceptibly in conflict with other Courts. IN CONCLUSION For the reasons stated-above, Applicant respectfully requests that the Court grant an extension of 60 days, up to and including October 2, 2023, within which to file a writ of certiorari in this case. I thank you. spect submffe e Wil Mr. M. Hillman Post Office Box 27757 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 19118-0757 (215) 990-1155 Applicant / Petitioner / Pro Se > . July 20, 2023 2.)