Lawrence L. Crawford v. Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
DueProcess
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals violated due process and judicial precedent by improperly declining jurisdiction over its own remand order
No question identified. : OF THE 4TH. CIRCUIT'S RECENT RULING AND IF TIME COMES FOR ME TO FILE PETITION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. I NOT HAVE IT FOR THAT PURPOSE. I AM ASKING THAT YOU PLEASE WAIVE THIS REQUIREMENT SIR IF SUCH EXIST. CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS SIR, SINCE WHEN IN ALL HIGH HEAVEN DO A COURT OF APPEAL ASSERT THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION, EVEN IN ITS LIMITED CAPACITY OVER A REMAND ORDER THAT IT HAS ISSUED FROM ITS OWN COURT? IT IS THE 4TH. CIRCUIT'S OWN REMAND ORDER CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS. CASE LAW CLEARLY STATES THAT ALL APPELLATE COURTS AROUND THIS NATION RETAIN PARTIAL AND OR LIMITED JURISDICTION OVER ANY REMAND ORDER THAT IS ISSUED FROM Its COURTS. SO WHAT IN THE WORLD IS THE 4TH. CIRCUIT DOING IN CLEAR ACTS OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE VIOLATING THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE DOING ASSERTING THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO ADDRESS VIOLATIONS OF THE MANDATE RULE BASED UPON A REMAND ORDER THAT THEY ISSUED FROM THEIR VERY OWN COURT? HOW LONG CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS? HOW LONG SIR WILL YOU ALLOW THE 4TH. CIRCUIT JUDGES TO ENGAGE IN THESE EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES VIOLATING THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE TO UPHOLD THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, IN HOW THEY TREAT THE APPLICANT'S DUE PROCESS MATTERS AS THEY APPEAR BEFORE THAT COURT? SIR, I HAVE A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO PROCEEDING NOT SUBJECT TO UNLAWFUL BIAS AND PREJUDICE TO SEEK AND SEEK THAT THE 4TH. CIRCUIT RULE RULE ON WHETHER THE S.C. DISTRICT COURT VIOLATED THE MANDATE RULE BASED UPON THE S.C. DISTRICT COURT'S MAY 1, 2023 DETERMINATION TO ENSURE THAT THE ISSUE IS PROPERLY PRESERVED IN CASE I HAVE TO BRING IT BEFORE THIS COURT. PLEASE INTERVENE CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS AND INSTRUCT THE 4TH. CIRCUIT TO STOP THE INJUSTICE, INVOKE THEIR LIMITED JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN THIS ISSUE, WHICH THEY DO INDISPUTABLY HAVE, TO ALLOW ME TO PROPERLY PRESERVE THIS ISSUE FOR POTENTIALLY ANY NEEDED FURTHER APPELLATE REVIEW. IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO ASSIST ME IN THIS MATTER SIR, WHICH I PRAY THAT YOU DO INTERVENE. I RESPECTFULLY RESERVE THE RIGHT TO 2-o0f-3 SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION BEFORE ANOTHER JUSTICE OF MY CHOOSING FOR THE SAKE OF "JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS". BE BLESSED, HAVE A PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR, AND I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE SIR. RESPECTFULLY, JONAH THE TISHBITE JANUARY 16, 2024 3-o0f-3 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DOCKET NO. 22-7096 LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE, APPELLANT AND RON SANTA McCRAY, INTERVENOR Vs. WARDEN AT LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DEFENDANT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT I HAVE MAILED AND OR SERVED A COPY OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND OR RESET SEEKING TO STAY AND OR RECALL l-of-9 LEGAL CRAWFORD-300839 THE MANDATE IF NEEDED; MOTION TO OBJECT TO RULING OF PANEL; MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC; MOTION FOR § 1407 TRANSFER DUE TO FRAUD UPON THE COURT, ON THE 4TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL INVOLVED PARTIES, BY U.S. MAIL, POSTAGE PREPAID, BY DEPOSITING IT IN THE INSTITUTION MAILBOX ON JANUARY 13, 2024. THIS TYPED VERSION OF THE PREVIOUS HAND WRITTEN (18) PAGE DOCUMENT DATED DATED JANUARY 13, 2024 IN THE INSTITUTION MAILBOX ON JANUARY 17, 2024. IT IS DEEMED FILED ON THAT DATE, HOUSTON v.LACK, 287 U.S. 266, 273-76, 108 S.Ct. 2379 (U.S.1988). RESPECTFULLY, JONAH THE TISHBITE JANUARY 17, 2024 “—2-o0f-9 LEGAL CRAWFORD-300839 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DOCKET NO. 22-7096 LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD AKA JONAH GABRIEL JAHJAH T. TISHBITE, APPELLANT AND RON SANTA McCRAY, INTERVENOR Vs. WARDEN AT LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DEFENDANT AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS GIVING JUDICIAL NOTICE; MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND OR RESET SEEKING TO STAY AND OR RECALL THE MANDATE IF NEEDED; MOTION TO OBJECT TO RULING OF PANEL + MOTION FOR REHEARIN EN BANC; MOTION FOR § 1407 TRANSFER DUE TO FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND MOTION TO MOTION THEREFOR 3-o0f-9 LEGAL CRAWFORD-30