Whether due process protections are violated when state child welfare investigations rely on admittedly falsified conclusions to deprive parents of fundamental liberty interests without adequate judicial review

Applicants have sought emergency relief at every other possible venue in the state and country related to violations of the fourteenth amendment causing Applicants irreparable harm. The fundamental Constitutional issue for which Applicants seek emergency relief relates to child welfare investigations admitted to be fraudulently concluded which direct Respondents have determinatively relied upon to deprive federal rights of and unlawfully confine Applicants for years. Not only are these underlying federal claims unreached by every other possible venue in the state and country, but Applicants’ emergency claims of irreparable harm are also unreached in every other possible venue. There is no other available venue for Applicants’ emergency relief sought than from this Court through this Application. THE QUESTION PRESENTED Is: Should emergency writs of injunction pending appeals issue against enforcement of direct Respondents’ orders for which due process, already appealed through this Court without adequate relief, has not been provided in seven years of litigation, which fundamentally rely upon admittedly falsified conclusions to child welfare investigations, violate child maltreatment and other statutes, and deprive Applicants’ most precious and protected rights and liberty interests, including physical liberty, when underlying constitutional claims, repeatedly presented, are unreached by ali lower state and federal judiciaries, causing undue delay and impeding this Court’s appellate jurisdiction, due to irreparable harms sustaining such unconstitutional actions causes Applicants?