Whether a state supreme court can improperly interfere with federal court jurisdiction by sua sponte remanding a previously removed case without legal basis

The questions presented are: I. II. TIL. Whether Illinois Supreme court could endorse a Cook county state lower court abuses and could the Federal Jurisdiction of an UNOPPOSED, REMOVED case, by suasponte ‘planting the case’ in state court calendar after more than a year , and without any certified remand order, in exchange for bribes paid by a ruthless, white collar criminal mortgage loan servicing company respondent Ocwen Loan servicing. [Refer to Group Exhibit 1 of numerous law suits; Fifty State Attorney General law suits; Law suit by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; a second law suit by Florida attorney General for breach of Settlement Agreement with Fifty State Attorney Generals; Cease and Desist order by Illinois Department of Professional Regulations; numerous law suits by Homeowners, Class action law suits. Whether Illinois Supreme Court could endorse a Cook county state lower court abuses and could the Federal Jurisdiction of an UNOPPOSED, REMOVED case by suasponte ‘planting the case’ in state court calendar after more than a year when no motion to remand filed Whether Illinois Supreme court could endorse a cook county state lower court abuses and could the Federal Jurisdiction of an UNOPPOSED, REMOVED case by swasponte “planting the case’ in state court calendar after the state court itself entered orders that the case in “Federal jurisdiction; Acknowledged UNOPPOSED REMOVAL to Federal Court. A. PREAMBLE Petitioner /Applicant for the purpose of this Court to be appraised of complete SUMMARY OF FACTS, EVIDENCE SUPPORTING FACTS, ARGUMENT , LEGAL PRECEDENTS AND AUTHORITIES attaché as Group Exhibit Z , the Petition for Leave To Appeal filed in Illinois Supreme court. Due to the voluminous filings of over 120 pages including