Whether a state court's denial of a post-conviction review petition without addressing substantive claims of legal error violates a criminal defendant's due process rights

No question identified. : Carmen T. Dit ltpp antenic (ADCHSS34MG, a ASPC= Eymon~ Cook Unit 3fe/2en. a __P.0. Box 3500~ 3/e/aor. _ Flovence, AZ 85132 IN THE SUPREME CouRT oF THE UNITED STATES 0 0 2 CARMEN. DIEMAPPANTANIO, | United States Sugeeme Cour} ei Hfomnew, | se No VS, —— Avizons Supreme Cour + = ; __RYAN_THORWEML, Director ef tne | Case No CR-23-0304-PR nn Avizena Depar-tmentef cavvectfons Ay izena Courkel! Appesls,divisi en One —— Rehabilitation aud Reewkry jouk | Case Ne. 1 CArcn 22-0486 WE STATE OF ARIZONA, — apai County Superior Cour-+ | Case No. PIZ00CR 2020CHT F PETITION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION EoR A Z WRIT OF CERTIORARL, pursuit to Supreme Court Rule 3e@)-G). —_Comes_nous Pelt Honer CARMEN DIRILiPPANTeANS, In peapvia persona ach tenn — —pauipasity ond respectfully petitions te Henorable Tustics sea Kagan seperate con — a Pakition Foro Wit -of CewHoraei by May 34,2094.. — oe. 5 The Arizona. Supreme Cour denied. Pebitionen's Petition For Review im his _.shate. direek appeal fram his jury trial eriminal ease-en March 52004. Tine Menfleke Ih t Avizowa Court of Appecls,, Division one, has not yetissuel. see, Mdachmend 4. Se Petitioner intends te present the issues roised im the skate courts te Yne United states Supceme Cour, which shoull prove compelling reasens for its gram = ~ ting of oo Wit of covtioravi. These include thet o state court of last wesoet has decides important questions ina way that conflicts with He decisions ef ano= thee state courts) of lask resort cov of a United States court el cppeals, aad Hak austate court has decided important questions of federal law that has nek beexy, _ but shoul& be, settled hy this Come, or has decides iaaportant fellecal questions ne a. 3 way neck cenplich: with relevant Vecisions of Vis Cour, — The extuatime is needed because of de maany ionpeiments te prepress = endemic te incarcerotion, suchas Peaquenk and. unpredictable clesures of the ol——— —veody limited access | ow bibeary, feele-Sowns, and otver daily intecruplions Furthermore, Petioner hos. ne attorney Pat fae froma lag alschelan,and mes eds the. Hime to. properly cull olequately stuby and comprehend the velevaut laws and. procedures go.a5 40 ceasonably ond sensibly orkculute bis eloimes. = RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 25ih Jay of AMecclr 2024, = ty Hermans DM pendoniD = = CARMEN _DIFILIPPAN TON I10, Petitioner. = ATTACHMENT 4 ta, se Wy 8 aN) = s * Aken OF > ian? Supreme Court STATE OF ARIZONA ROBERT BRUTINEL ARIZONA STATE COURTS BUILDING TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 1501 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 402 Clerk of the Court Chief Justice PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 ‘TELEPHONE: (602) 452-3396 March 5, 2024 STATE OF ARIZONA v CARMEN DIFILIPPANTONIO CR-23-0314-PR RE: Arizona Supreme Court No. Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CR 22-0186 Yavapai County Superior Court No. P1300CR202000657 GREETINGS: The following action was taken by the Supreme Court of the State 2024, in regard to the above-referenced of Arizona on March 5, cause: ORDERED: Petition for Review = DENIED. Tracie K. Lindeman, Clerk TO: Alice Jones Carmen Difilippantonio, ADOC 353746, Arizona State Prison, Florence Eyman Complex-Cook Unit Amy M. Wood eg CERTIFICATE oF SERVICE ——— NL mereby certify Haat on tis 25th Bay ef Marsh, 2624/1 handed Mae evi ginal ond two cxpies of Fhe fovegeing Petition, the attachment, and this Cevti fi cate, to bre ASPCEymam~ Cook Unit Property / Mai (room officew for _prepes sanitiing aud elivery Marewgh 0.3.9.5 ato the Clerk of United Stokes Supreme Courk, Supreme Court of Sve United sabes ulashisaren, D.C. 208 YBmocet, Ain copy to4 Avizeua AXocasy Gunecal’s OPfice _ QooS N. Combral Ave. — Phoauix, AZ BSeoH = 2926,_ = attorney fov Respondents, = pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22.2, CARMEN DIFLLIPPAN TONIC, Petibiener.